Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. B. H.

State v. B. H.

329 P.3d 813, 264 Or. App. 186
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 2, 2014
DocketC130067MC; A155874
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 329 P.3d 813 (State v. B. H.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. B. H., 329 P.3d 813, 264 Or. App. 186 (Or. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this appeal, appellant seeks reversal of an order committing him for a period not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. He contends, in an unpreserved assignment of error, that the trial court erred in failing to inform him of his right to subpoena witnesses, as required by ORS 426.100(1). The state concedes the error, and we agree that that failure constitutes plain error. We further conclude, for the reasons stated in State v. M. L. R., 256 Or App 566, 570-72, 303 P3d 954 (2013), that it is appropriate to exercise our discretion to correct the error.1

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Z. A. B.
334 P.3d 480 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
329 P.3d 813, 264 Or. App. 186, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-b-h-orctapp-2014.