State v. B. E. G.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. B. E. G.

508 P.3d 997, 319 Or. App. 260

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 20, 2022

DocketA176816

StatusPublished

This text of 508 P.3d 997 (State v. B. E. G.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. B. E. G., 508 P.3d 997, 319 Or. App. 260 (Or. Ct. App. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

Submitted March 4, reversed April 20, 2022

In the Matter of B. E. G., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. B. E. G., Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 21CC04525; A176816 508 P3d 997

Matthew L. Tracey, Judge pro tempore. Alexander C. Cambier filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jona J. Maukonen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Cite as 319 Or App 260 (2022) 261

PER CURIAM Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment commit- ting her to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days and an order prohibiting her from pur- chasing or possessing firearms. She asserts that the court plainly erred in committing her because the record contains no citation and no evidence that she had been served with a citation, as required by ORS 426.080 and ORS 426.090. The state concedes the error. We agree and accept the state’s concession. ORS 426.090 requires the court to issue a citation that informs a person alleged to have a mental illness of specific rights, and ORS 426.080 specifies that the per- son serving the citation “shall, immediately after service thereof, make a return upon the original warrant or citation showing the time, place and manner of such service and file it with the clerk of the court.” We conclude that the trial court plainly erred in failing to comply with those statutes, and for the reasons set forth in State v. J. R. W., 307 Or App 372, 475 P3d 138 (2020), and State v. R. E. J., 306 Or App 647, 474 P3d 461 (2020), we exercise discretion to correct the error. Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Submitted March 4, reversed April 20, 2022

In the Matter of B. E. G., a Person Alleged to have Mental Illness. STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. B. E. G., Appellant. Marion County Circuit Court 21CC04525; A176816 508 P3d 997

Matthew L. Tracey, Judge pro tempore. Alexander C. Cambier filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jona J. Maukonen, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. Before James, Presiding Judge, and Aoyagi, Judge, and Joyce, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed. Cite as 319 Or App 260 (2022) 261

PER CURIAM Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment commit- ting her to the Oregon Health Authority for a period not to exceed 180 days and an order prohibiting her from pur- chasing or possessing firearms. She asserts that the court plainly erred in committing her because the record contains no citation and no evidence that she had been served with a citation, as required by ORS 426.080 and ORS 426.090. The state concedes the error. We agree and accept the state’s concession. ORS 426.090 requires the court to issue a citation that informs a person alleged to have a mental illness of specific rights, and ORS 426.080 specifies that the per- son serving the citation “shall, immediately after service thereof, make a return upon the original warrant or citation showing the time, place and manner of such service and file it with the clerk of the court.” We conclude that the trial court plainly erred in failing to comply with those statutes, and for the reasons set forth in State v. J. R. W., 307 Or App 372, 475 P3d 138 (2020), and State v. R. E. J., 306 Or App 647, 474 P3d 461 (2020), we exercise discretion to correct the error. Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

508 P.3d 997, 319 Or. App. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-b-e-g-orctapp-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack