State v. B. B.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. B. B.

153 P.3d 158, 211 Or. App. 102, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 239, 2007 WL 465898

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided February 14, 2007·No. 040565680; A125142·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person to the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that, because of his mental disorder, he is presently a danger to himself. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we agree and accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Appellant seeks reversal of a judgment committing him as a mentally ill person to the Mental Health Division for a period not to exceed 180 days. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that, because of his mental disorder, he is presently a danger to himself. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient for involuntary commitment and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we agree and accept the state’s concession and reverse.

Reversed.

State v. B. B., 153 P.3d 158, 211 Or. App. 102, 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 239, 2007 WL 465898 (Or. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

153 P.3d 158 (State v. B. B.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.