State v. Aziz

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Aziz

836 S.W.2d 956, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1500, 1992 WL 230212

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 22, 1992

DocketNos. 60236, 61313

StatusPublished

This text of 836 S.W.2d 956 (State v. Aziz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Aziz, 836 S.W.2d 956, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1500, 1992 WL 230212 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

[957]*957ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his first degree tampering conviction for which he was sentenced to a term of fifteen years imprisonment and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[957]*957ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his first degree tampering conviction for which he was sentenced to a term of fifteen years imprisonment and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The judgments are based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. An opinion would have no prece-dential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

836 S.W.2d 956, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1500, 1992 WL 230212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-aziz-moctapp-1992.