State v. Azevedo

675 A.2d 416, 1996 R.I. LEXIS 129, 1996 WL 208542
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedApril 18, 1996
DocketNo. 96-69-M.P.
StatusPublished

This text of 675 A.2d 416 (State v. Azevedo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Azevedo, 675 A.2d 416, 1996 R.I. LEXIS 129, 1996 WL 208542 (R.I. 1996).

Opinion

ORDER

This criminal matter came before the court on a petition for writ of certiorari wherein [417]*417defendant seeks review of a Superior Court order denying his motion to dismiss a charge of driving under the influence of liquor (§ 31-27-2). Defendant asserts that in light of his prior trial on a related breathalyzer-refusal charge, further criminal prosecution of the DUI charge is barred by the constitutional prohibitions against double jeopardy.

While the pretrial denial of a double jeopardy claim is an appealable order, see Abney v. United States, 431 U.S. 651, 97 S.Ct. 2034, 52 L.Ed.2d 651 (1977), we see in defendant’s petition no colorable double jeopardy or collateral estoppel claim, and accordingly we perceive no basis upon which to grant discretionary review in this case.

The petition for writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abney v. United States
431 U.S. 651 (Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 A.2d 416, 1996 R.I. LEXIS 129, 1996 WL 208542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-azevedo-ri-1996.