State v. Azbell

862 N.E.2d 120, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1495
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 2007
Docket2005-1788
StatusPublished

This text of 862 N.E.2d 120 (State v. Azbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Azbell, 862 N.E.2d 120, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1495 (Ohio 2007).

Opinion

Richland App. No. 2005-CA-0004, 2005-0hio-4405. Reported at 112 Ohio St.3d 300, 2006-Ohio-6552, 859 N.E.2d 532. On motion for reconsideration. Motion fails for want of four votes.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., would grant the motion. Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., would deny the motion. Cupp, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Azbell
112 Ohio St. 3d 300 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
862 N.E.2d 120, 112 Ohio St. 3d 1495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-azbell-ohio-2007.