State v. . Ayers

39 S.E.2d 607, 226 N.C. 579, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 280
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedOctober 9, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 39 S.E.2d 607 (State v. . Ayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. . Ayers, 39 S.E.2d 607, 226 N.C. 579, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 280 (N.C. 1946).

Opinion

*580 Per Curiam.

The defendant contends that notwithstanding his plea of nolo contendere, the court could not pronounce judgment without determining his guilt or innocence. The contention is without merit. A plea of nolo contendere is equivalent to a plea of guilty, in so far as it gives the court power to punish; and the court may impose sentence thereon as upon a plea of guilty. S. v. Parker, 220 N. C., 416, 17 S. E. (2d), 475; S. v. Burnett, 174 N. C., 796, 93 S. E., 473.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Norman
170 S.E.2d 923 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1969)
State v. Norman
169 S.E.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)
State v. Sellers
161 S.E.2d 15 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1968)
Peel v. State
150 So. 2d 281 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
State Ex Rel. Clark v. Adams
111 S.E.2d 336 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1959)
Winesett v. Scheidt
79 S.E.2d 501 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1954)
State v. Cooper
77 S.E.2d 695 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
State v. Thomas
72 S.E.2d 525 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1952)
State v. Shepherd
55 S.E.2d 79 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 S.E.2d 607, 226 N.C. 579, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ayers-nc-1946.