State v. Ayers

673 So. 2d 869, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 213, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 826, 1996 WL 266250
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 1996
DocketNos. 87105, 87106, 87107 and 87108
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 673 So. 2d 869 (State v. Ayers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ayers, 673 So. 2d 869, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 213, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 826, 1996 WL 266250 (Fla. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the Second District Court of Appeal’s decision in State v. Ayers, 665 So.2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).1 In Ayers, the Second District relied on our prior decision in State v. Winters, 346 So.2d 991 (Fla.1977), to declare section 827.05, Florida Statutes (1993), unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.

Consistent with the Second District’s decision, this Court recently concluded that section 827.05, as amended in 1977,2 remains unconstitutionally vague under our prior decision in Winters. State v. Mincey, 672 So.2d 524 (Fla.1996). Accordingly, we affirm.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Frias
Idaho Supreme Court, 2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
673 So. 2d 869, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 213, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 826, 1996 WL 266250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ayers-fla-1996.