State v. Ayala

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Ayala

598 A.2d 365, 220 Conn. 922, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 477

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 9, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 598 A.2d 365 (State v. Ayala) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ayala, 598 A.2d 365, 220 Conn. 922, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 477 (Colo. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does the order of the Appellate Court granting review but denying relief with respect to the defendant’s motion for review of the trial court’s order revok[923]*923ing the defendant’s release on bond pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 54-64f constitute a final judgment reviewable by this court pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 51-197f?

Michael A. Georgetti, in support of the petition. Susan C. Marks, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 9, 1991

“2. If the order of the Appellate Court is reviewable, does Connecticut General Statutes § 54-64f as applied to the defendant violate the right of bail provision of article first, § 8, of our state constitution?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does the order of the Appellate Court granting review but denying relief with respect to the defendant’s motion for review of the trial court’s order revok[923]*923ing the defendant’s release on bond pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 54-64f constitute a final judgment reviewable by this court pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 51-197f?

Michael A. Georgetti, in support of the petition. Susan C. Marks, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 9, 1991

“2. If the order of the Appellate Court is reviewable, does Connecticut General Statutes § 54-64f as applied to the defendant violate the right of bail provision of article first, § 8, of our state constitution?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

598 A.2d 365, 220 Conn. 922, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ayala-conn-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack