State v. Ayala

598 A.2d 365, 220 Conn. 922, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 477
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 9, 1991·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does the order of the Appellate Court granting review but denying relief with respect to the defendant’s motion for review of the trial court’s order revok[923]*923ing the defendant’s release on bond pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 54-64f constitute a final judgment reviewable by this court pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 51-197f?

Michael A. Georgetti, in support of the petition. Susan C. Marks, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 9, 1991

“2. If the order of the Appellate Court is reviewable, does Connecticut General Statutes § 54-64f as applied to the defendant violate the right of bail provision of article first, § 8, of our state constitution?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Ayala, 598 A.2d 365, 220 Conn. 922, 1991 Conn. LEXIS 477 (Colo. 1991).

598 A.2d 365 (State v. Ayala) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ayala
610 A.2d 1162 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1992)