State v. Axiom

23 La. Ann. 621
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 15, 1871
DocketNo. 226
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 23 La. Ann. 621 (State v. Axiom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Axiom, 23 La. Ann. 621 (La. 1871).

Opinion

Howe, J.

The defendant having been convicted of manslaughter aud sentenced accordingly has appealed and presents two points:

First — That he was not served with a correct jury list. This point, made for the firs.t time after verdict, came too late. State v. Vester, lately decided; 23 An. —; State v. Clark, 23 An. 194.

[622]*622Second — That Moses Brockett who appeared by the clerk’s minutes,, at the time the motion for a new trial was made, to have been impanneled' as a grand juror, was not on the venire of jurors, was not a-registered voter of tho paiish, and was not a competent, juror. It might have been added, probably with equal truth, that there was no such person in being. For it plainly appears that the name Brockett in tho minutes was a clerical error for Crockett; that Moses Crockett was on the venire, was impanneled on the grand jury, and was a competent juror; and that this error was duly corrected, so ihat tho-minutes now show the true fact and not the fiction behind which the-appellant seeks to take shelter. This correction of the minutes was-properly made. 2 An. 745; 9 An. 94; 10 An. 193

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Regopoulas v. State
41 S.E. 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 La. Ann. 621, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-axiom-la-1871.