State v. Axiom

23 La. Ann. 621
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided July 15, 1871·No. No. 226·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Howe, J.

The defendant having been convicted of manslaughter aud sentenced accordingly has appealed and presents two points:

First — That he was not served with a correct jury list. This point, made for the firs.t time after verdict, came too late. State v. Vester, lately decided; 23 An. —; State v. Clark, 23 An. 194.

[622]*622Second — That Moses Brockett who appeared by the clerk’s minutes,, at the time the motion for a new trial was made, to have been impanneled' as a grand juror, was not on the venire of jurors, was not a-registered voter of tho paiish, and was not a competent, juror. It might have been added, probably with equal truth, that there was no such person in being. For it plainly appears that the name Brockett in tho minutes was a clerical error for Crockett; that Moses Crockett was on the venire, was impanneled on the grand jury, and was a competent juror; and that this error was duly corrected, so ihat tho-minutes now show the true fact and not the fiction behind which the-appellant seeks to take shelter. This correction of the minutes was-properly made. 2 An. 745; 9 An. 94; 10 An. 193

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Axiom, 23 La. Ann. 621 (La. 1871).

23 La. Ann. 621 (State v. Axiom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Regopoulas v. State
41 S.E. 619 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)