State v. Austin
789 P.2d 18, 101 Or. App. 231, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 322
This text of 789 P.2d 18 (State v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Austin, 789 P.2d 18, 101 Or. App. 231, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 322 (Or. Ct. App. 1990).
Opinion
Defendant appeals his conviction for driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. He contends that the court erred by admitting certain documents; he contends that they are hearsay.
The evidence of defendant’s guilt was overwhelming and any error in admitting the documents was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
§ 813.010
Oregon § 813.010
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
789 P.2d 18, 101 Or. App. 231, 1990 Ore. App. LEXIS 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-austin-orctapp-1990.