State v. Austin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Austin

456 S.W.3d 862, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1364, 2014 WL 6941733

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 9, 2014·No. ED 100414·Published

Opinion

Order

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Austin appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for kidnapping, aggravated stalking, and third-degree domestic assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2014).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Austin appeals from a sentence and judgment of conviction for kidnapping, aggravated stalking, and third-degree domestic assault. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that no reversible error occurred. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b) (2014).

State v. Austin, 456 S.W.3d 862, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 1364, 2014 WL 6941733 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

456 S.W.3d 862 (State v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.