State v. Austin Blake Thrasher

CourtIdaho Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 28, 2014
StatusUnpublished

This text of State v. Austin Blake Thrasher (State v. Austin Blake Thrasher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Austin Blake Thrasher, (Idaho Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 40954

STATE OF IDAHO, ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 529 ) Plaintiff-Respondent, ) Filed: May 28, 2014 ) v. ) Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk ) AUSTIN BLAKE THRASHER, ) THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED ) OPINION AND SHALL NOT Defendant-Appellant. ) BE CITED AS AUTHORITY )

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, Bonner County. Hon. Barbara A. Buchanan, District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified life sentence, with twenty-five years determinate, for first degree murder, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben Patrick McGreevy, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. ________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GRATTON, Judge

PER CURIAM Austin Blake Thrasher pled guilty to first degree murder. Idaho Code § 18-4001. The district court sentenced Thrasher to a unified life sentence, with twenty-five years determinate. Thrasher appeals, contending his sentence is excessive. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho

1 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Thrasher’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joyce Livestock Co. v. United States
156 P.3d 502 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2007)
State v. Hernandez
822 P.2d 1011 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1991)
State v. Lopez
680 P.2d 869 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1984)
State v. Toohill
650 P.2d 707 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1982)
State v. Oliver
170 P.3d 387 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
State v. Austin Blake Thrasher, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-austin-blake-thrasher-idahoctapp-2014.