State v. Atwood
This text of State v. Atwood (State v. Atwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30337 05-OCT-2012 08:59 AM
NO. SCWC-30337
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
STATE OF HAWAI'I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
TERRANCE E. ATWOOD, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(ICA NO. 30337; CR. NO. 07-1-0635)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
AND REQUESTING FURTHER BRIEFING
(By: Nakayama, Acting C.J., Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.
and Circuit Judge Sakamoto,
in place of Recktenwald, C.J., recused)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant’s application for writ
of certiorari filed on August 24, 2012, is hereby accepted and
will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties will be
notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that each party shall file a
supplemental brief addressing the issue of whether sufficient
evidence existed to indict Petitioner under Hawai'i Revised
Statutes § 708-830.5(1)(a) for theft “[o]f property or services,
the value of which exceeds $20,000[.]” Each party’s supplemental brief shall not exceed 10 pages in length and shall be filed
within 14 days after the filing of this order.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 5, 2012.
David A. Sereno for /s/ Paula A. Nakayama petitioner /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. Peter A. Hanano for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Karl K. Sakamoto
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State v. Atwood, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-atwood-haw-2012.