State v. Atti
25 A.2d 634, 128 N.J.L. 318, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 247
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan.
Since the assignment was abandoned in the Supreme Court, there is no occasion to consider whether in the circumstances there was error in overruling questions propounded to the accused as to the taking of “legal advice” respecting his right to vote; and the point is therefore reserved.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, PIeher, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Atti, 25 A.2d 634, 128 N.J.L. 318, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 247 (N.J. 1942).
25 A.2d 634 (State v. Atti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the November 2, 2010 General Election
31 A.3d 945 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2011)
Gibson v. Callaghan
730 A.2d 1278 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999)
Arents v. General Acc. Ins. Co.
655 A.2d 936 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)