State v. Atti
This text of 25 A.2d 634 (State v. Atti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Brogan.
Since the assignment was abandoned in the Supreme Court, there is no occasion to consider whether in the circumstances there was error in overruling questions propounded to the accused as to the taking of “legal advice” respecting his right to vote; and the point is therefore reserved.
For affirmance — -The Chancellor, Bodine, Donges, PIeher, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 A.2d 634, 128 N.J.L. 318, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-atti-nj-1942.