State v. Atteberry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Atteberry

497 S.W.3d 860, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 873, 2016 WL 4597493

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 6, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103478

StatusPublished

This text of 497 S.W.3d 860 (State v. Atteberry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Atteberry, 497 S.W.3d 860, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 873, 2016 WL 4597493 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jimmy Atteberry appeals from the circuit court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of five counts related to the possession and sale of marijuana, methadone, and amphetamine. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for then- information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jimmy Atteberry appeals from the circuit court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of five counts related to the possession and sale of marijuana, methadone, and amphetamine. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for then- information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

497 S.W.3d 860, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 873, 2016 WL 4597493, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-atteberry-moctapp-2016.