State v. Atteberry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Atteberry

497 S.W.3d 860, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 873, 2016 WL 4597493

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 6, 2016·No. No. ED 103478·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jimmy Atteberry appeals from the circuit court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of five counts related to the possession and sale of marijuana, methadone, and amphetamine. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for then- information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Jimmy Atteberry appeals from the circuit court’s judgment after a jury convicted him of five counts related to the possession and sale of marijuana, methadone, and amphetamine. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for then- information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Atteberry, 497 S.W.3d 860, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 873, 2016 WL 4597493 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

497 S.W.3d 860 (State v. Atteberry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.