State v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Atkinson

187 S.E.2d 702, 281 N.C. 152, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1019

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedApril 12, 1972

DocketNo. 49

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 187 S.E.2d 702 (State v. Atkinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Atkinson, 187 S.E.2d 702, 281 N.C. 152, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1019 (N.C. 1972).

Pincite

Opinions

MOORE, Justice.

In State v. Atkinson, 279 N.C. 386, 183 S.E. 2d 106, filed September 7, 1971, for the reasons there stated by Chief Justice Bobbitt, this Court remanded the cause to the Superior Court of Wayne County for the pronouncement of judgment imposing a sentence of life imprisonment. On November 3, 1971, in open court, after due notice and in the presence of defendant and his counsel, Judge Tillery pronounced judgment that defendant be imprisoned for life in the State’s prison. Defendant excepted and gave notice of appeal. The questions he attempts to raise by his assignments of error on the present appeal heretofore have been decided adversely to defendant in this cause.

Judge Tillery’s judgment, having been entered in strict compliance with our order of September 7, 1971, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MOORE, Justice.

In State v. Atkinson, 279 N.C. 386, 183 S.E. 2d 106, filed September 7, 1971, for the reasons there stated by Chief Justice Bobbitt, this Court remanded the cause to the Superior Court of Wayne County for the pronouncement of judgment imposing a sentence of life imprisonment. On November 3, 1971, in open court, after due notice and in the presence of defendant and his counsel, Judge Tillery pronounced judgment that defendant be imprisoned for life in the State’s prison. Defendant excepted and gave notice of appeal. The questions he attempts to raise by his assignments of error on the present appeal heretofore have been decided adversely to defendant in this cause.

Judge Tillery’s judgment, having been entered in strict compliance with our order of September 7, 1971, is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 S.E.2d 702, 281 N.C. 152, 1972 N.C. LEXIS 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-atkinson-nc-1972.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack