State v. Ater

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Ater

351 S.W.3d 246, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1419, 2011 WL 5064303

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 25, 2011·No. ED 94320·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David A. Ater appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree murder and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no error, plain or otherwise. Rule 30.20; 1 State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

David A. Ater appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree murder and kidnapping. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no error, plain or otherwise. Rule 30.20; 1 State v. Washington, 260 S.W.3d 875, 879 (Mo.App. E.D.2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2010, unless otherwise indicated.

State v. Ater, 351 S.W.3d 246, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1419, 2011 WL 5064303 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

351 S.W.3d 246 (State v. Ater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related