State v. Ast
This text of 202 Mont. 3 (State v. Ast) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DECISION
The application of the above-named defendant for a review of the sentence of 8 years with 4 years suspended imposed on May 18, 1982, was fully heard and after a careful consideration of the entire matter it is decided that:
The sentence shall remain the same as originally imposed.
This Board agrees that the Defendant needs supervision. Considering the fact she gathered all the material together and started out with the intent to carry the plan through and considering the potential of what could have happened, the [4]*4Board feels the sentence was justified.
We wish to thank Mr. Dan Sweeney, Attorney at Law, for his assistance to the Defendant and to this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 Mont. 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ast-mont-1983.