State v. Askew

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Askew

693 A.2d 300, 240 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 161

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided April 24, 1997·No. SC 15674·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 280 (AC 14771), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the trial court prejudice the defendant by improperly excluding from evidence the victim’s prior felony larceny conviction while allowing into evidence the defendant’s prior conviction?

“2. Under the circumstances of this case, did the trial court improperly deny the defendant’s request for a Telfaire instruction?”

Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided April 24, 1997

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 280 (AC 14771), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the trial court prejudice the defendant by improperly excluding from evidence the victim’s prior felony larceny conviction while allowing into evidence the defendant’s prior conviction?

“2. Under the circumstances of this case, did the trial court improperly deny the defendant’s request for a Telfaire instruction?”

Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided April 24, 1997

State v. Askew, 693 A.2d 300, 240 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 161 (Colo. 1997).

Pincite

693 A.2d 300 (State v. Askew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related