State v. Askew

693 A.2d 300, 240 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 161
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedApril 24, 1997
DocketSC 15674
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 693 A.2d 300 (State v. Askew) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Askew, 693 A.2d 300, 240 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 161 (Colo. 1997).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 44 Conn. App. 280 (AC 14771), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Under the circumstances of this case, did the trial court prejudice the defendant by improperly excluding from evidence the victim’s prior felony larceny conviction while allowing into evidence the defendant’s prior conviction?
“2. Under the circumstances of this case, did the trial court improperly deny the defendant’s request for a Telfaire instruction?”
Ronald G. Weller, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided April 24, 1997

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Askew
716 A.2d 36 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
693 A.2d 300, 240 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-askew-conn-1997.