State v. Askary

Supreme Court of Florida

State v. Askary

330 So. 2d 458, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4429

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedApril 7, 1976

DocketNo. 45740

StatusPublished

This text of 330 So. 2d 458 (State v. Askary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Askary, 330 So. 2d 458, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4429 (Fla. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

OVERTON, Chief Justice.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal reported at 294 So.2d 33 (Fla.App.3rd 1974). In its opinion the District Court held illegal an order of a trial court imposing three years probation with six months incarceration in the county jail as an initial condition, citing Hutchins v. State, 286 So.2d 244 (Fla.App.3d 1974). That holding conflicts with our recent decision in State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976). We have jurisdiction.¹

We reverse the portion of the District Court’s opinion striking the imposition of probation by the trial court, and the cause is remanded with directions to reinstate the order of probation. See State v. Jones, supra.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OVERTON, Chief Justice.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Third District Court of Appeal reported at 294 So.2d 33 (Fla.App.3rd 1974). In its opinion the District Court held illegal an order of a trial court imposing three years probation with six months incarceration in the county jail as an initial condition, citing Hutchins v. State, 286 So.2d 244 (Fla.App.3d 1974). That holding conflicts with our recent decision in State v. Jones, 327 So.2d 18 (Fla.1976). We have jurisdiction.¹

We reverse the portion of the District Court’s opinion striking the imposition of probation by the trial court, and the cause is remanded with directions to reinstate the order of probation. See State v. Jones, supra.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD and ENGLAND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

330 So. 2d 458, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-askary-fla-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack