State v. Asher

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Asher

814 S.W.2d 21, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1325, 1991 WL 165707

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 3, 1991·No. No. 58818·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted in a jury-waived trial of the class C felony of stealing, third offense, in violation of § 570.040, RSMo 1986. He appeals; we affirm. The judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information [22]*22only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted in a jury-waived trial of the class C felony of stealing, third offense, in violation of § 570.040, RSMo 1986. He appeals; we affirm. The judgment is based upon findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information [22]*22only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Asher, 814 S.W.2d 21, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1325, 1991 WL 165707 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

814 S.W.2d 21 (State v. Asher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.