State v. Ashe

226 S.E.2d 398, 30 N.C. App. 74, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2148
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedJuly 7, 1976
Docket7630SC210
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 226 S.E.2d 398 (State v. Ashe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Ashe, 226 S.E.2d 398, 30 N.C. App. 74, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2148 (N.C. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PARKER, Judge.

This appeal is from the same trial as is reported in State v. Bryson, 30 N.C. App. 71, 226 S.E. 2d 392 (Case No. *75 7630SC192, opinion filed contemporaneously herewith.) Defendants raise the same questions for review as are presented in State v. Bryson, supra. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, we find no error.

Because of the filing of an unnecessary record on appeal and because unnecessary matter was included in the records filed, counsel for defendants will be personally taxed with a portion of the costs. Rule 9 (b) (5) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure; State v. Bryson, supra.

No error.

Chief Judge Brock and Judge Arnold concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Inscoe
250 S.E.2d 107 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 S.E.2d 398, 30 N.C. App. 74, 1976 N.C. App. LEXIS 2148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ashe-ncctapp-1976.