State v. Artis

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Artis

452 S.W.3d 742, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 48, 2015 WL 252179

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 2015·No. WD 77058·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Artis Jr. appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, section 195.211, RSMo Cum.Supp.2013, and sixteen-year sentence. In his two points on appeal, he contends that the trial court plainly erred in (1) failing to strike a portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument and admonish the jury to disregard it, and (2) admitting testimony that laboratory examination showed the substance seized to be .marijuana. Because a published opinion would [743] have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Artis Jr. appeals his conviction of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute, section 195.211, RSMo Cum.Supp.2013, and sixteen-year sentence. In his two points on appeal, he contends that the trial court plainly erred in (1) failing to strike a portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument and admonish the jury to disregard it, and (2) admitting testimony that laboratory examination showed the substance seized to be .marijuana. Because a published opinion would [743] have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Artis, 452 S.W.3d 742, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 48, 2015 WL 252179 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

452 S.W.3d 742 (State v. Artis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.