State v. Arsham
This text of 861 So. 2d 113 (State v. Arsham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Because the showing made by the criminal defendant below was totally insufficient to justify a bodily intrusion into the privacy of the alleged victim, the order requiring her to provide a DNA sample is quashed. See State v. Famiglietti 817 So.2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review dis[114]*114missed, 838 So.2d 528 (Fla.2003); State v. Kuntsman, 643 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); State v. Brewster, 601 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Bartlett v. Hamwi, 626 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
Certiorari granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
861 So. 2d 113, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19522, 2003 WL 23009008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-arsham-fladistctapp-2003.