State v. Arsham
861 So. 2d 113, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19522, 2003 WL 23009008
Opinion
Because the showing made by the criminal defendant below was totally insufficient to justify a bodily intrusion into the privacy of the alleged victim, the order requiring her to provide a DNA sample is quashed. See State v. Famiglietti 817 So.2d 901 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), review dis[114] missed, 838 So.2d 528 (Fla.2003); State v. Kuntsman, 643 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); State v. Brewster, 601 So.2d 1289 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992); Bartlett v. Hamwi, 626 So.2d 1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
Certiorari granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Arsham, 861 So. 2d 113, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 19522, 2003 WL 23009008 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).
861 So. 2d 113 (State v. Arsham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bartlett v. Hamwi
626 So. 2d 1040 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
State v. Brewster
601 So. 2d 1289 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
State v. Famiglietti
817 So. 2d 901 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Kuntsman
643 So. 2d 1172 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Famiglietti v. State
838 So. 2d 528 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)