State v. Arroyo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Arroyo

937 A.2d 694, 284 Conn. 938, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 498

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedNovember 15, 2007

DocketSC 18031

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 937 A.2d 694 (State v. Arroyo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Arroyo, 937 A.2d 694, 284 Conn. 938, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 498 (Colo. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn. App. 167 (AC 28044), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the special credibility instruction mandated in State v. Patterson, 276 Conn. 452, 886 A.2d 777 (2005), was not applicable?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the verdicts were not legally inconsistent?”

SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn. App. 167 (AC 28044), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the special credibility instruction mandated in State v. Patterson, 276 Conn. 452, 886 A.2d 777 (2005), was not applicable?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the verdicts were not legally inconsistent?”

SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

937 A.2d 694, 284 Conn. 938, 2007 Conn. LEXIS 498, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-arroyo-conn-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack