State v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Arnold

749 P.2d 619, 89 Or. App. 565, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 215

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedFebruary 17, 1988

DocketCF 87-95; CA A44267

StatusPublished

This text of 749 P.2d 619 (State v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Arnold, 749 P.2d 619, 89 Or. App. 565, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 215 (Or. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted for possession of a controlled substance and for delivery of a controlled substance. Both convictions arose out of the same transaction and involved the same drug. The state concedes, and we agree, that there should have been only one conviction. State v. Finn, 79 Or App 439, 719 P2d 898 (1986).

Judgments vacated; remanded for entry of a single judgment of conviction and for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant was convicted for possession of a controlled substance and for delivery of a controlled substance. Both convictions arose out of the same transaction and involved the same drug. The state concedes, and we agree, that there should have been only one conviction. State v. Finn, 79 Or App 439, 719 P2d 898 (1986).

Judgments vacated; remanded for entry of a single judgment of conviction and for resentencing.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

749 P.2d 619, 89 Or. App. 565, 1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-arnold-orctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack