State v. Arnold
This text of 700 N.E.2d 876 (State v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Greene App. No. 91-CA-43. Appellant has filed a notice of appeal of the judgment entered September 10, 1998, by the Greene County Court of Appeals in case No. 91-CA-43. According to appellant’s notice of appeal, he has filed a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Under S.CtPrac.R. II(2)(A)(1), if an appeal is a claimed appeal of right or a discretionary appeal, the appellant shall also file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction at the time the notice of appeal is filed. Whereas appellant has failed to file a memorandum in support of jurisdiction as required by S.CtPrac.R. II(2)(A)(1).
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this case be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
700 N.E.2d 876, 83 Ohio St. 3d 1458, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-arnold-ohio-1998.