State v. . Arnold

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Arnold

160 S.E. 925, 201 N.C. 824, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 117

DecidedSeptember 30, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 160 S.E. 925 (State v. . Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Arnold, 160 S.E. 925, 201 N.C. 824, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 117 (N.C. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

On the hearing the trial narrowed itself largely to issues of fact, which the jury resolved in favor of the State and against the contentions of the defendants. A different verdict might have been returned, but it was not.

*825 Tbe record discloses no exceptive assignment of error upon which this Court, in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction, could award the defendants a new trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

On the hearing the trial narrowed itself largely to issues of fact, which the jury resolved in favor of the State and against the contentions of the defendants. A different verdict might have been returned, but it was not.

*825 Tbe record discloses no exceptive assignment of error upon which this Court, in the exercise of its appellate jurisdiction, could award the defendants a new trial. The verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 S.E. 925, 201 N.C. 824, 1931 N.C. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-arnold-nc-1931.