State v. Arnold

905 S.W.2d 549, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1539, 1995 WL 534967
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Arnold. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1316
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 12, 1995·No. No. 66975·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of one count of second degree robbery (Count I), § 569.030, RSMo 1986, and two counts of assault of a law enforcement officer, third degree (Counts II and III), § 565.083, RSMo Supp.1993. He was sentenced by the court as a prior and persistent offender to prison terms of eight years on Count I and one year each on Counts II and III. Counts II and III were concurrent to each other and concurrent to the sentence in Count I. We affirm.

We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Arnold, 905 S.W.2d 549, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1539, 1995 WL 534967 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

905 S.W.2d 549 (State v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.