State v. Arner

538 So. 2d 528, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 443, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 714, 1989 WL 11287
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 1989
DocketNo. 88-1093
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 538 So. 2d 528 (State v. Arner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Arner, 538 So. 2d 528, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 443, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 714, 1989 WL 11287 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We believe that the trial court acted within its discretion in granting a new trial to appellee because of the alleged incompetency of his counsel. On the record before us we cannot say that the trial court applied the wrong legal standard or that its findings of fact were without evidentiary support.

DOWNEY and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur. GLICKSTEIN, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Dawkins
863 P.2d 124 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1993)
Rose v. State
591 So. 2d 195 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 So. 2d 528, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 443, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 714, 1989 WL 11287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-arner-fladistctapp-1989.