State v. Armstrong

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Armstrong

856 S.W.2d 132, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1034, 1993 WL 254691

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 6, 1993

DocketNo. 62003

StatusPublished

This text of 856 S.W.2d 132 (State v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Armstrong, 856 S.W.2d 132, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1034, 1993 WL 254691 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals from his conviction of second-degree assault in violation of § 565.060 RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b),

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this jury-tried case, defendant appeals from his conviction of second-degree assault in violation of § 565.060 RSMo 1986. Defendant was sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b),

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

856 S.W.2d 132, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1034, 1993 WL 254691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-armstrong-moctapp-1993.