State v. Armstrong

855 So. 2d 731, 2003 La. LEXIS 2235, 2003 WL 22061430
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided September 5, 2003·No. No. 2002-KP-2464·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Granted in part; otherwise denied. This case is remanded to the district court for purposes of conducting an evidentiary hearing and ruling on relator’s claim that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to request that the trial court include criminal trespass as a responsive verdict. See State v. Simmons, 01-0293, pp. 6-7 (La.5/14/02), 817 So.2d 16, 21 (criminal trespass is a lesser and included offense of unauthorized entry of an inhabited dwelling, entitling defendant charged with the latter offense to instruction on the former, particularly when defendant would have escaped sentencing as multiple offender had he been convicted of a misdemeanor); State v. Hernandez, 02-0340 (La.App. 5th Cir.7/30/02), 824 So.2d 529 (same). In all other respects, the application is denied. La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.3; State ex rel. Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La.1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172.

CALOGERO, J, recused. VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Armstrong, 855 So. 2d 731, 2003 La. LEXIS 2235, 2003 WL 22061430 (La. 2003).

855 So. 2d 731 (State v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Roland
865 So. 2d 692 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2004)