State v. Armstrong

637 So. 2d 448, 1994 La. LEXIS 1477, 1994 WL 244940

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Armstrong. Read the opinion of the Court — 671 So. 2d 307 →

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 3, 1994·No. No. 93-K-2914·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

After conducting an independent review of the record and considering the remarks of [449]*449counsel during oral argument, we conclude that the decision of the Fourth Circuit does not require the exercise of our supervisory-authority. Cf., La.S.Ct. Rule X, § 1(a). Accordingly, we recall our order of February 25, 1994, 632 So.2d 768, as improvidently granted.

KIMBALL, J., not on panel. SHORTESS, J., Judge, First Circuit Court of Appeal, sitting in place of DENNIS, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

KIMBALL, J., not on panel. SHORTESS, J., Judge, First Circuit Court of Appeal, sitting in place of DENNIS, J.

State v. Armstrong, 637 So. 2d 448, 1994 La. LEXIS 1477, 1994 WL 244940 (La. 1994).

Pincite

637 So. 2d 448 (State v. Armstrong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.