State v. Armstrong
This text of 3 Ind. 139 (State v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Indictment against the defendant in error for suffering his horse to be run along and upon a public highway in the county of Tippecanoe. The indictment was quashed on motion.
The only objection which appears to have been taken to the indictment, was, that the termini of the highway were not stated. This point has been decided in the case of The State v. Burgett, Ind. R. 340
The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.
1 Carter’s Ind. R. 479. The same point is also decided in The State v. Brown, id. 532.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Ind. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-armstrong-ind-1851.