State v. Armstrong

3 Ind. 139
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 2, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Ind. 139 (State v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Armstrong, 3 Ind. 139 (Ind. 1851).

Opinion

Smith, J.

Indictment against the defendant in error for suffering his horse to be run along and upon a public highway in the county of Tippecanoe. The indictment was quashed on motion.

The only objection which appears to have been taken to the indictment, was, that the termini of the highway were not stated. This point has been decided in the case of The State v. Burgett, Ind. R. 340

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bridgewater
85 N.E. 715 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1908)
State v. New
76 N.E. 181 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Ind. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-armstrong-ind-1851.