State v. Armstead

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Armstead

613 So. 2d 956, 1993 La. LEXIS 968, 1993 WL 43233

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided February 17, 1993·No. No. 93-KH-0278·Published

Opinion

In re Armstead, Milton; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about January 13, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Armstead, Milton; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about January 13, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.

ORTIQUE, J., not on panel.

State v. Armstead, 613 So. 2d 956, 1993 La. LEXIS 968, 1993 WL 43233 (La. 1993).

Pincite

613 So. 2d 956 (State v. Armstead) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.