State v. Armstead
This text of 613 So. 2d 956 (State v. Armstead) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Armstead, Milton; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writ; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “G”.
The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion to correct an illegal sentence he has filed on or about January 13, 1992. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion. If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the relator’s application which is herewith transferred to the district court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
613 So. 2d 956, 1993 La. LEXIS 968, 1993 WL 43233, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-armstead-la-1993.