Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Arendale

State v. Arendale

590 So. 2d 1131, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 206, 1992 WL 273
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 3, 1992
DocketNo. 91-1720
StatusPublished

This text of 590 So. 2d 1131 (State v. Arendale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Arendale, 590 So. 2d 1131, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 206, 1992 WL 273 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse and remand for resentencing because the trial court erred in failing to enter a contemporaneous written order of departure. Ree v. State, 565 So.2d 1329, 1331 (Fla.1990).

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING.

GLICKSTEIN, C.J., and DOWNEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ree v. State
565 So. 2d 1329 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
590 So. 2d 1131, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 206, 1992 WL 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-arendale-fladistctapp-1992.