State v. Aradi

Florida Circuit Courts

State v. Aradi

26 Fla. Supp. 2d 159

CourtCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida

DecidedFebruary 1, 1988

DocketCase No. 87-054 AC (County Court Case No. 7727Z,3PG)

StatusPublished

This text of 26 Fla. Supp. 2d 159 (State v. Aradi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Aradi, 26 Fla. Supp. 2d 159 (Fla. Super. Ct. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

SALMON, J.

The State is not responsible to produce state witnesses subpoenaed [160]*160by the defense for discovery purposes. State v. Del Guadio, 445 So.2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The requests for continuance made by Appellee, therefor, made him unavailable for trial within the meaning of the speedy trial rule. He should not have been discharged. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.191(d)(3).

Reversed and remanded for trial.

HENDERSON and NADLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

SALMON, J.

The State is not responsible to produce state witnesses subpoenaed [160]*160by the defense for discovery purposes. State v. Del Guadio, 445 So.2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). The requests for continuance made by Appellee, therefor, made him unavailable for trial within the meaning of the speedy trial rule. He should not have been discharged. Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.191(d)(3).

Reversed and remanded for trial.

HENDERSON and NADLER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 Fla. Supp. 2d 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-aradi-flacirct-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack