State v. Arabie
This text of 502 So. 2d 565 (State v. Arabie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of Louisiana
v.
Shelby ARABIE.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Denied.
LEMMON, J., concurs with reasons.
DIXON, C.J., and CALOGERO, J., would grant the writ.
LEMMON, Justice, concurring in the Denial of the Application.
The double jeopardy problem encountered in Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U.S. 40, 101 S.Ct. 970, 67 L.Ed.2d 30 (1981), is not present here. The trial judge reviewed the jury verdict (on a post-verdict motion for acquittal) as a question of law and rendered a judgment of conviction on the lesser included responsive offense of manslaughter. La.C.Cr.P. art. 821 C. The court of appeal further reviewed the trial court's action as a question of law and properly reinstated the verdict of guilty of second degree murder. This action by the court of appeal was not a retrial of the defendant and did not constitute a double jeopardy violation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
502 So. 2d 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-arabie-la-1987.