State v. Applicants for a Road

Supreme Court of New Jersey

State v. Applicants for a Road

3 N.J.L. 949

DecidedMay 15, 1812

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 949 (State v. Applicants for a Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Applicants for a Road, 3 N.J.L. 949 (N.J. 1812).

Pincite

Opinion

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— I think that this motion is a special motion, requiring notice.

Rossexx, J. — Of that opinion.

Pennington, J.

— According to former decisions of this Court, this writ ought not to have been issued; but on mo[691]*691tion in open court, and special circumstances shewn. In my opinion, therefore, it ought to be quashed before it is filed, and that no notice is necessary in such case.

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— I think that this motion is a special motion, requiring notice.

Rossexx, J. — Of that opinion.

Pennington, J.

— According to former decisions of this Court, this writ ought not to have been issued; but on mo[691]*691tion in open court, and special circumstances shewn. In my opinion, therefore, it ought to be quashed before it is filed, and that no notice is necessary in such case.

Rule refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.J.L. 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-applicants-for-a-road-nj-1812.