State v. Applebaum
This text of 296 So. 2d 591 (State v. Applebaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an interlocutory appeal by the State, seeking to reverse an order suppressing certain conversations between the defendants in the criminal proceeding and a prosecution witness.
[592]*592The conversations occurred after the State had filed an information and issued a capias, but prior to the time it had arrested the defendants or notified them of the proceedings. We reverse upon the reasoning found in Parnell v. State, Fla.App.1969, 218 So.2d 535 and in Scaldeferri v. State, Fla.App.1974, 294 So.2d 407,1 and hold that the trial judge erred in suppressing the conversations of February 15, 1973, and return the matter to the trial court for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded, with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 So. 2d 591, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-applebaum-fladistctapp-1974.