State v. Aponte
This text of 776 A.2d 1150 (State v. Aponte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 63 Conn. App. 82 (AC 20234), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s jury instruction regarding the specific intent necessary for a charge of conspiracy to commit murder was constitutionally sufficient?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court’s instruction regarding the use of a deadly weapon on the vital part of another was constitutionally sufficient?”
ZARELLA, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
776 A.2d 1150, 256 Conn. 935, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-aponte-conn-2001.