State v. Aponte

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Aponte

719 A.2d 1169, 247 Conn. 926, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 412

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedOctober 22, 1998

DocketSC 16028

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 719 A.2d 1169 (State v. Aponte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Aponte, 719 A.2d 1169, 247 Conn. 926, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 412 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 114 (AC 15002), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the actions of the prosecutor did not result in a denial of due process?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the victim’s testimony?”

Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 114 (AC 15002), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the actions of the prosecutor did not result in a denial of due process?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the victim’s testimony?”

Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1998

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

719 A.2d 1169, 247 Conn. 926, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 412, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-aponte-conn-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack