State v. Aponte

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Aponte

719 A.2d 1169, 247 Conn. 926, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 412

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 22, 1998·No. SC 16028·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 114 (AC 15002), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the actions of the prosecutor did not result in a denial of due process?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the victim’s testimony?”

Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1998

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 50 Conn. App. 114 (AC 15002), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the actions of the prosecutor did not result in a denial of due process?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in admitting the victim’s testimony?”

Michele C. Lukban, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition. Decided October 22, 1998

State v. Aponte, 719 A.2d 1169, 247 Conn. 926, 1998 Conn. LEXIS 412 (Colo. 1998).

Pincite

719 A.2d 1169 (State v. Aponte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related