State v. . Antonio
This text of 11 N.C. 200 (State v. . Antonio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The prisoner moved, before judgment, to set aside the verdict, and have a new venire because of the denial of his prayer for a jury de medietate, which being refused, and judgment pronounced, the prisoner appealed. Judge Williams informed me that he allowed it at a court of oyer and terminer held at Wilmington many years ago for the trial of some prisoners who were aliens and natives of France. *Page 89
GASTON: It seems, then, to have been considered the law; the Legislature has not since altered it.
Attorney-General for the State. (204)
The Court differed in opinion, HALL and HENDERSON holding that the prisoner was not entitled to a jury de medietate, and the Chief Justice that he was, and they delivered their respective opinions seriatim, as follows:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 N.C. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-antonio-nc-1825.