State v. Anthony
This text of 93 Ohio St. 3d 1295 (State v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Auglaize App. No. 2-01-01. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed August 1, 2001, at page 4:
“Is the statute, R.C. 4507.16(A), authorizing suspension of a driver’s license for felony in commission of which a motor vehicle is used, reserved to those situations in which the motor vehicle is used either as a weapon or to trahsport contraband, or is the subject of the crime charged?”
The conflict case is State v. Krug (1993), 89 Ohio App.3d 595, 626 N.E.2d 984.
Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 01-1393, State v. Anthony, Auglaize App. No. 2-2001-01.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 Ohio St. 3d 1295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anthony-ohio-2001.