State v. Anthony

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Anthony

358 A.2d 698, 171 Conn. 734

DecidedJune 1, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 358 A.2d 698 (State v. Anthony) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Anthony, 358 A.2d 698, 171 Conn. 734 (Colo. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

It appearing that the state in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the defendant’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo [735]*735motu, that unless the state files its brief on or before June 15, 1976, the judgment be set aside and the case be remanded with direction to render judgment for the defendant.

William F. Gallagher, special assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). John B. Williams, for the appellant (defendant). Argued June 1 decided June 1, 1976

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

It appearing that the state in the above-entitled case has failed to defend against the defendant’s appeal from the Superior Court in New Haven County with proper diligence, it is, under Practice Book § 696, ordered by the Supreme Court, suo [735]*735motu, that unless the state files its brief on or before June 15, 1976, the judgment be set aside and the case be remanded with direction to render judgment for the defendant.

William F. Gallagher, special assistant state’s attorney, for the appellee (state). John B. Williams, for the appellant (defendant). Argued June 1 decided June 1, 1976

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

358 A.2d 698, 171 Conn. 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-anthony-conn-1976.