State v. Angell

655 A.2d 259, 232 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 86
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 22, 1995·No. SC 15206·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 383 (AC 12359), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[916] Decided February 22, 1995 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 15206. R. Jeffrey Lyman, Patricia E. McCooey and Linda L. Morkan, in support of the petition. Pamela S. Meotti, deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

“1. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the defendant’s federal constitutional rights of confrontation were not violated when the trial court admitted into evidence constancy of accusation testimony.

“2. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the defendant’s exception to the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the credibility of a child witness was inadequate to preserve the issue for appeal.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Angell, 655 A.2d 259, 232 Conn. 915, 1995 Conn. LEXIS 86 (Colo. 1995).

655 A.2d 259 (State v. Angell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Angell
677 A.2d 912 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1996)