State v. Angell
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 383 (AC 12359), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the defendant’s federal constitutional rights of confrontation were not violated when the trial court admitted into evidence constancy of accusation testimony.
“2. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the defendant’s exception to the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the credibility of a child witness was inadequate to preserve the issue for appeal.”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
655 A.2d 259 (State v. Angell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.