Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/State v. Angel T.

State v. Angel T.

944 A.2d 979, 286 Conn. 907, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 120
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 6, 2008
DocketSC 18121
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 944 A.2d 979 (State v. Angel T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Angel T., 944 A.2d 979, 286 Conn. 907, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 120 (Colo. 2008).

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 568 (AC 27168), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the state’s attorney’s elicitation of evidence regarding a [908]*908missed meeting between the police and the defendant, and his comment thereon in summation, constituted prosecutorial impropriety which deprived the defendant of his right to a fair trial?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18121. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Gary A. Mastronardi, in opposition. Decided March 6, 2008

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. ANGEL T.
973 A.2d 1207 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
944 A.2d 979, 286 Conn. 907, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-angel-t-conn-2008.