State v. Angel T.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Angel T.

944 A.2d 979, 286 Conn. 907, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 120

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided March 6, 2008·No. SC 18121·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 568 (AC 27168), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the state’s attorney’s elicitation of evidence regarding a [908]*908missed meeting between the police and the defendant, and his comment thereon in summation, constituted prosecutorial impropriety which deprived the defendant of his right to a fair trial?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18121. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Gary A. Mastronardi, in opposition. Decided March 6, 2008

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 105 Conn. App. 568 (AC 27168), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the state’s attorney’s elicitation of evidence regarding a [908]*908missed meeting between the police and the defendant, and his comment thereon in summation, constituted prosecutorial impropriety which deprived the defendant of his right to a fair trial?”

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18121. Timothy J. Sugrue, senior assistant state’s attorney, in support of the petition. Gary A. Mastronardi, in opposition. Decided March 6, 2008

State v. Angel T., 944 A.2d 979, 286 Conn. 907, 2008 Conn. LEXIS 120 (Colo. 2008).

Pincite

944 A.2d 979 (State v. Angel T.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related