State v. Andujar
306 S.W.3d 710, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 2010 WL 1608676
Opinion
ORDER
Sandrio Andujar appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting him of second degree assault of a law enforcement officer after a jury trial. Andujar claims that the trial court plainly erred in failing to sua sponte: (1) intervene when the State asked Andu-jar on cross-examination if he was in this country illegally, and (2) strike the State’s closing argument that the State’s witness *711 did not have any reason to lie to the jury. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Andujar, 306 S.W.3d 710, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 2010 WL 1608676 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
306 S.W.3d 710 (State v. Andujar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gladden v. Gladden
306 S.W.3d 710 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)