State v. Andujar

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Andujar

306 S.W.3d 710, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 2010 WL 1608676

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 6, 2010

DocketWD 70362

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 306 S.W.3d 710 (State v. Andujar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Andujar, 306 S.W.3d 710, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 2010 WL 1608676 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Sandrio Andujar appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting him of second degree assault of a law enforcement officer after a jury trial. Andujar claims that the trial court plainly erred in failing to sua sponte: (1) intervene when the State asked Andu-jar on cross-examination if he was in this country illegally, and (2) strike the State’s closing argument that the State’s witness *711 did not have any reason to lie to the jury. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Sandrio Andujar appeals the trial court’s judgment convicting him of second degree assault of a law enforcement officer after a jury trial. Andujar claims that the trial court plainly erred in failing to sua sponte: (1) intervene when the State asked Andu-jar on cross-examination if he was in this country illegally, and (2) strike the State’s closing argument that the State’s witness *711 did not have any reason to lie to the jury. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 S.W.3d 710, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 506, 2010 WL 1608676, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-andujar-moctapp-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack