State v. Andrews

Court of Appeals of South Carolina·Decided March 3, 2009·No. 2009-UP-111·Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dwight Gaynor Andrews, Appellant.


Appeal From Richland County
G. Thomas Cooper, Circuit Court Judge


Unpublished Opinion No. 2009-UP-111
Submitted March 2, 2009 – Filed March 3, 2009


AFFIRMED


Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Dwight Gaynor Andrews appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing the trial court erred in not making a finding on the record that the State presented sufficient evidence showing he violated the terms of his probation.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Lee, 350 S.C. 125, 130, 564 S.E.2d 372, 375 (Ct. App. 2002) (stating an issue must be raised to and ruled upon by the trial court in order to be preserved for review).

AFFIRMED.

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur. 


[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Andrews, (S.C. Ct. App. 2009).

State v. Andrews (State v. Andrews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lee
564 S.E.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2002)